The ballot question:
"Should approval of proposed development agreements, development projects, sales, and leases of the GM/JATCO sites for projects exceeding $450 million in project costs be decided by a majority vote of the electors?”
Not with developers. Not with state lobby groups, out-of-town interests or big names with privileged access to Janesville's decision makers. LOCAL. With neighbors and residents who will live with the benefits, and the consequences, of major development.
Housing. Jobs. Taxes. Property values. Land uses. Infrastructure. Public health. Environment. Resources. Site Remediation. Quality of life.
All projects are NOT created equal and do not address our needs equally. Not all development is responsible development.
Does a massive project meet our community's needs or just a developer's bottom line? Is our community a true beneficiary of economic development, or just an afterthought? See and understand community impacts for projects and proposals exceeding $450 million in project costs before city hall signs on the dotted line.
In the last year, we've seen NDAs, difficult and delayed public-records requests, limited public information, city communication with developers for over a year before public announcements, negotiation extensions completed outside the public domain, information from industry sources with financial interests in the outcome, and a process that left neighbors with little ability to independently evaluate a massive data center proposal. If citizens have a guaranteed vote, then transparency and meaningful communication isn't optional. It's a required part of moving massive projects forward responsibly.